Teaching plans this spring with Kathleen Eamon...
“Poets are the sense, philosophers the intelligence of humanity.” – Samuel Beckett
"What Beckett offers in the way of philosophy he himself also reduces to culture-trash..." – Adorno on Beckett's "Endgame".
“I never read the philosophers… I never understand what they write.” - Samuel Beckett
Description
Our study will blend careful, in-depth reading of major philosophical thinkers with a close reading of Samuel Beckett's "Trilogy" (Molloy, Malone Dies, The Unnamable). That trilogy offers us a monumental reading, steeped in the literary and philosophical provocations of the classical and modern eras. Our two central goals are both connected and in tension. On the one hand, we will let Beckett direct our philosophical interests to specific moments in and approaches to a whole vast range of questions about being human, about pleasure, and about death. Our readings of those moments and approaches will in turn open up new readings of Beckett's fiction and allow us to mine them for the poetic and other truths, truths that both escape but also ground philosophy.
In philosophy, we will read early modernists Descartes and Leibniz, Kant on the specifically human limits on and possibilities for knowledge, Freud to think about play, creativity, pleasure, and death, and Schopenhauer on art, aesthetics, and representation. Beckett's work will provide an opportunity to look carefully at the philosophic and literary legacy of the Enlightenment as encapsulated in its endgame, modernism. We'll see how, in absorbing and transforming that historical arc of Western European thought, Beckett moved away from Joycean erudition, literary refinement, and culture, and toward an aesthetic of powerlessness. Finally, Beckett arrives at the difficulty of expressing – or being – anything at all. In so doing, Beckett crafted a unique and unified body of work that draws on the devastations of war, on wordlessness in the face of a universe made provisional, and on the strange voice of one who has nothing to express, no means to express, yet the obligation to express.
Comments